THIS TIME: THE DENNIS WALLACE SAGA ENDS WITH AN ECONOMIC BANG, NOT A WHIMPER.

In the sad story of the late Sheriff’s Deputy Dennis Wallace, the County of Stanislaus may get stuck with a big bill: $1,471,843.95.

An order from Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Timothy W. Salter says that’s what Dennis’s attorneys are owed.

Dennis may have given his life in service to the same agency which may have included him on a list of those thought to be “limp, lame and lazy”. For more than six years, the County fought to keep from paying him for time they kept him off the job.

His death limited all the money he was personally owed because certain claims died with him out there at the Fox Grove fishing access when a mentally unstable man shot him twice in the head on November 11, 2016.

(If you are familiar with the chain of events you can skip down to the paragraph headed in bold face which begins: In a 7- page, single spaced Minute Order…)

A little less than 10 years after he was hired as a patrol deputy, Dennis injured, then reinjured his left knee on duty. He wore a knee brace but kept working his regular job until he had surgery on the knee followed by a period of light duty.

After a series of light duty assignments and paid leave, and after working as a bailiff, Dennis underwent a medical examination through workers compensation. The orthopedic surgeon listed restrictions which the county said precluded him from any position within the sheriff’s office, including bailiff.

As a result, the County offered to look for other county jobs but they would not be “safety” positions, which would affect his retirement pay, benefits, and self-esteem.

Dennis used up sick leave and accrued vacation but kept up the fight to get back to full employment. An accommodation was reached, and Dennis underwent another examination with a different physician, leading to his full re-instatement as a patrol deputy on January 30, 2013.

As Dennis fought for his re-instatement, his bay area attorneys fought in court for his loss of pay and benefits while on unpaid leave.

There were two jury trials stemming from Dennis’ claim that he was discriminated against because of a disability.

The first trial ended with some findings by the jury in favor of the County but ended in a mistrial because the jury could not resolve  the issues.

The second trial ended with findings in favor of the County.

During the trials, two things stood out. One was the supposed list of people which sheriff’s office administrators deemed “limp, lame and lazy”, in other words, malingerers. The other was the claim by Dennis that he was fit for duty and would prove it in a foot race with Sheriff Adam Christensen.  The sheriff recalled no such challenge.

On February 25, 2016, about eight months after he died, the Fifth District Court of Appeal overturned the jury verdict, found that, as a matter of fact,  Dennis has been the victim of disability discrimination, and returned the case to the Stanislaus County Superior Court to determine the amount of damages owed, as well as other issues which would stem from a finding in favor of Dennis, including attorney’s fees and costs.

The California Supreme Court denied review of the Appellate Court’s decision about four months later.

 

 

So, the matter came back to our local court and was assigned to Judge Salter. He undertook to resolve the issues of attorney’s fees and costs as Dennis’ widow, Mercedes, settled the lost pay claim with the county for $251,500.

In a 7-page-single spaced Minute Order, Judge Salter recapped the case from its onset through two jury trials and an appeal.

The judge needed to determine if, and how much, Dennis’ trial and appeal team should receive. The County took the position that because the case settled Dennis was not the “prevailing party”.

Judge Salter noted that the settlement amount paid was “for all intents and purposes, the same amount of economic damages Deputy Wallace proved at trial…”

So, the judge employed what is called the “catalyst theory” which turns a settling party into a a prevailing party if they caused change on the other side. The County ponied up the economic damages only because of the persistence of Dennis’ team.

The court noted that current case law allows use of the catalyst theory when there is independent merit. “This case has independent merit in abundance,” Judge Salter wrote.

The next argument the county made was that the team of trial and appellate lawyers were charging too much on an hourly rate, contending it could have been done cheaper with “local” lawyers.

Dennis’ team showed that efforts were made to hire local counsel, and no one would take the case. Not surprising since this team spent more than 1,800 hours over six years without being paid, as well as spending almost $100,000 in costs.

Judge Salter, in his order, said he reviewed and re-reviewed the submissions and gave the bay area lawyers their “home” hourly rate instead of the rate prevailing in Modesto. Their rates ranged from $400 to $650 per hour.

He then applied a multiplier based on the skill and experience of the lawyers, the difficulty of the case and other factors, noting this was “not a run of the mill disability claim”. He multiplied by 1.35 and came up the total of $1,373,142.30.

He also awarded costs of $98,701.65

The County could appeal this ruling, exposing it to more fees and costs.

Whenever it finally ends, if not now, there will be a bill.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s